[hackmeeting] Fw: Clarification about distribution terms on the software
fulgor en nettaxi.com
Mar Sep 25 22:37:24 CEST 2001
Mira, me ha llegado esto de la lista de desarrolladores de SELinux, hablando
de debian y de SELinux...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Manoj Srivastava" <manoj.srivastava en stdc.com>
To: <selinux en tycho.nsa.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:28 PM
Subject: Clarification about distribution terms on the software
> [This is a repost from the address I am subscribed with, and
> hence some people on the internal list shall see this as a
> duplicate. I apologize for the inconvenience]
> A number of developers for the Debian Project
> have expressed an interest in rolling in a kernel-patch-selinux
> package, for inclusion in the Debian GNU?Linux distribution.
> The criteria for inclusion of a package in the project are
> defined by the ``Debian Free Software Guidelines'' contained in the
> ``Social Contract'' (http://www.debian.org/social_contract).
> The initial impressions were good: The License terms at
> http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/license.html makes it very clear that the
> license terms are DFSG compliant.
> The confusion arises as one tries to download the sources, and
> is presented with http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/src-disclaim.html; one
> is now required to agree to a legal agreement (I am not a lawyer, it
> seems to be a restatement of the standard lack of warranty
> clauses. However, I am not a lawyer).
> One of the questions that arise from this is: Whom does the
> NSA want this agreement from? Me, as a packager, the Debian Project,
> as the distributor, or the end user of the software who is going to
> install it on their machines, and may be impacted by any flaws in the
> process of doing so? If indeed the end user agreement is required,
> SELinux would not meet the DFSG.
> Arguably, since the software itself is licensed under the GPL,
> on may, after downloading the software, further redistribute it as
> provided for by the GPL.
> However, Debian is not in the business of not adhering to
> upstream author wishes, and we would like to honour the intent, as
> opposed to the letter, of the license. Given that, the simplest
> process was to come to the horses mouth and ask the authors what
> their intent when putting a click-through legal agreement (which may
> well be binding in the state where jurisdiction lies) on the software
> download? Is agreement of the end users required, or is this only for
> the initial download?
> No animal should ever jump on the dining room furniture unless
> absolutely certain he can hold his own in conversation. Fran Lebowitz
> Manoj Srivastava <manoj.srivastava en stdc.com> <srivasta en debian.org>
> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
> You have received this message because you are subscribed to the selinux
> If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo en tycho.nsa.gov
> the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
Más información sobre la lista de distribución HackMeeting